Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 2039 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 16% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-2620 - 124 vs 107 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, $
$110
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5378 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |