Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Core i5-3570K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 862 days newer than Core i5-3570K.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 9% better in Starfield than Core i5-3570K - 51 vs 47 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570K
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 77 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65814 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
686
74.08207343412528%
Multi-Core
2071
51.826826826826824%
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-3570K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell-E | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |