Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600T outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14600T is 3409 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600T
- Performs up to 22% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 151 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i5-14600T
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
926
35.58800922367409%
Multi-Core
3996
26.714801444043324%
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-14600T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell-E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 14 |
| 12 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 85 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
