Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7845HX outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7845HX is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
- Performs up to 16% better in Sons Of The Forest than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 113 vs 97 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 55 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 9 7845HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
926
34.96978851963746%
Multi-Core
3996
29.01750054462276%
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Haswell-E | Codename | Dragon Range |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 85 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
