Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7645HX outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7645HX is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX
- Performs up to 27% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 156 vs 123 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 55 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 5 7645HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
926
34.578043315907394%
Multi-Core
3996
33.919022154316266%
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell-E | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 85 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
