Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 946 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 85 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 200 vs 197 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
200
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$125
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell-E | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |