Key Differences
In short — Core i7-1165G7 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-1165G7 is 2558 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-1165G7 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-1165G7
- Performs up to 14% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 125 vs 110 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-1165G7
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-1165G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1449 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU |
| No | Overclockable | No |
