Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 3313 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 69% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 258 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 20 vs 12 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
258
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$242.17
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $242.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4317 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 14 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |