Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v2 outperforms Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v2 is 728 days newer than Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Performs up to 1% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G540 - 165 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
164
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |