Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2609 v2 outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2609 v2 and Xeon E5-2630L v2 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 60 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 12 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2609 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Xeon E5-2630L v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge EP |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 60 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
