Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1220 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 14% better in Ready or Not than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 262 vs 230 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 51 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65285 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
350
28.06736166800321%
Multi-Core
998
40.9016393442623%
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |