Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 5300G outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 5300G is 2781 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
- Performs up to 7% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 317 vs 295 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for $84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65336 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
350
20.3843913803145%
Multi-Core
998
18.20503465888362%
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 5300G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Cezanne |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |