Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2440 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2440 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 23% better in God of War than Xeon E5-2440 v2 - 198 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2 - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$747.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $747.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge EN | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |