Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Xeon E5-2430 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2983 days newer than Xeon E5-2430.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2430
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2430 - 192 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2430 - 32 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
192
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$897.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $897.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2430 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 280 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |