Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1275 v2 outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1275 v2 and Xeon E5-2420 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2
- Performs up to 7% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2420 - 162 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | May 14th, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD P4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |