Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600T outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600T is 3887 days newer than Xeon E5-2420.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600T
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5-2420 - 193 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2420 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2420
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i5-13600T
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2420
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Single-Core
372
15.789473684210526%
Multi-Core
1815
14.783741956504032%
Intel Xeon E5-2420 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600T |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 14 |
| 12 | Threads | 20 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
| 2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
