Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 2300 days newer than Xeon E5-2420.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E5-2420 - 159 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2420 - 32 vs 12 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1075
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |