Key Differences
In short — Core i7-1068NG7 outperforms Xeon E5-2420 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-1068NG7 is 2160 days newer than Xeon E5-2420 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-1068NG7 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-1068NG7
- Performs up to 18% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 178 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 28 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2420 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-1068NG7
Mobile • Aug 1st, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-1068NG7 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge EN | Codename | Ice Lake |
| Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel BGA 1526 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Plus |
| No | Overclockable | No |
