Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Xeon E5-2420 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 3422 days newer than Xeon E5-2420 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 39% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 308 vs 222 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
308
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$368.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $368.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge EN | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |