Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 2675 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 23% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-1680 v4 - 225 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
225
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$433
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $433 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |