Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600 outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600 is 2389 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E5-1680 v4 - 181 vs 159 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1680 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i5-13600
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1680 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1228
50.38982355354945%
Multi-Core
7000
56.36070853462157%
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 14 |
| 16 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
