Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Z1 outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Z1 is 2531 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Z1 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Z1
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-1680 v4 - 149 vs 128 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-1680 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Ryzen Z1
Mobile • May 26th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1680 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1228
52.68125268125268%
Multi-Core
7000
81.78525528683257%
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | May 26th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Z1 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 740M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
