Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 8640U outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 8640U is 2725 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 8640U - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 8640U
- Performs up to 7% better in Apex Legends than Xeon E5-1680 v4 - 296 vs 277 FPS
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 - 28 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-1680 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Ryzen 5 8640U
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1680 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1228
49.47622884770346%
Multi-Core
7000
79.82666210514311%
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 760M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
