Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 2744 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 27% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 206 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5587 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |