Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1660 v4 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1660 v4 is 1713 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Performs up to 4% better in Stray than FX-6100 - 182 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 92% cheaper than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $29.65 vs $352.36
- Up to 91% better value when playing Stray than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $0.17 vs $1.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.94/FPS
8.762886597938145%
Price, $
$352.36
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $352.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
175
96.15384615384616%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$29.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $29.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |