Key Differences
In short — Core i3-1125G4 outperforms Xeon E5-1660 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-1125G4 is 2549 days newer than Xeon E5-1660 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-1125G4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1125G4
- Performs up to 24% better in Far Cry 6 than Xeon E5-1660 v2 - 122 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v2 - 28 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1660 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-1125G4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Tiger Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1449 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 28 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics G4 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |