Key Differences
In short — Core i9-8950HK outperforms Xeon E5-1650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-8950HK is 2218 days newer than Xeon E5-1650.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-8950HK
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E5-1650 - 238 vs 213 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1650
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i9-8950HK
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 | vs | Intel Core i9-8950HK |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
