Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms Xeon E5-1650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900HS is 2923 days newer than Xeon E5-1650.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Performs up to 5% better in The Outer Worlds than Xeon E5-1650 - 205 vs 196 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1650
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Ryzen 9 4900HS
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 7th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Renoir |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FP6 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics 512SP |
| No | Overclockable | No |
