Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 851 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 427 vs 404 FPS
- Up to 73% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $383.0 vs $1425.0
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $1,425 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Buy for $383 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
70.74340527577938%
Multi-Core
5480
68.84422110552764%
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |