Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 1730 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $66.0 vs $270.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-11900 - $0.33 vs $1.25 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 216 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
201
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |