Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 472 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i7-8700K - $45.93 vs $157.0
- Up to 69% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-8700K - $0.27 vs $0.88 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 6% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 179 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
169
94.41340782122904%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$45.93
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $45.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
30.681818181818183%
Price, $
$157
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $157 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
74.58912768647282%
Multi-Core
5480
85.05354648455689%
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700K |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |