Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 1410 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 75% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-10700KF - $0.09 vs $0.36 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 595 vs 530 FPS
- Up to 85% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $211.95 vs $1425.0
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 16 vs 12 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
530
89.07563025210085%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1425
14%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,425 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
595
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
25%
Price, $
$211.95
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for $211.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
69.41176470588235%
Multi-Core
5480
67.79661016949152%
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |