Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 1730 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - $78.02 vs $133.95
- Up to 34% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-11400 - $0.39 vs $0.59 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 12% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 226 vs 202 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
202
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
226
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
66%
Price, $
$133.95
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for $133.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |