Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 1112 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 12% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 595 vs 530 FPS
- Up to 72% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $395.0 vs $1416.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.66 vs $2.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 24 vs 12 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $1,416 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
595
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$395
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $395 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |