Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v3 and Xeon E5-2680 v3 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 127 vs 123 FPS
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 - 120 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 - 24 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-1650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
