Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2643 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v3 is 372 days newer than Xeon E5-2643 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
- Performs up to 7% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2643 v2 - 128 vs 120 FPS
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 - 130 vs 140 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Xeon E5-2643 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge EP |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 130 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
