Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 2389 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 116% better in Immortals of Aveum than Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 97 vs 45 FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 120 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7415 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |