Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 668 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 175 vs 173 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6587 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |