Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 1404 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 18% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 196 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
196
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5417 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Broadwell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |