Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 2136 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 140 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Performs up to 6% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 135 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 128 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$41.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$5600
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $5,600 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6034 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 64 |
8 | Threads | 128 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |