Buy on Amazon
$396.45
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $399
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 2129 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 8% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 137 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 3800XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.89/FPS
100%
Price, $
$396.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT 8-core, 16-Threads Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for $396.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 7 3800XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
