Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 2640 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 16% better in New World than Xeon E5-1620 - 116 vs 100 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 45 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
