Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 2039 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 10% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-1620 - 355 vs 323 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
355
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$208
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $208 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3257 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700K |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |