Buy on Amazon
$139
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $212
Availability
MSRP in USD: $212
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3570K outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3570K is 54 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570K
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-1620 - 119 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 77 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-3570K
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
119
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-3570K Quad-Core Processor 3.4 GHz 4 Core LGA 1155 - BX80637I53570K
Buy for $139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13978 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i5-3570K
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-3570K |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
