Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600 is 3612 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600
- Performs up to 24% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E5-1620 - 147 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
147
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$332.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $332.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |