Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 1216 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - $136.62 vs $799.0
- Up to 82% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-10920X - $0.2 vs $1.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 140 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 10% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 736 vs 669 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 24 vs 8 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
669
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$136.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $136.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Buy for $799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |