Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2389 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $232.12 vs $859.99
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 48% better in Rust than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 267 vs 181 FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 120 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77151 minutes ago
Buy for $859.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
37.28581220013708%
Multi-Core
3898
19.85432689858911%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |