Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 1112 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 8% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 264 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 61% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $89.84 vs $232.12
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77143 minutes ago
Buy for $89.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77142 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
68.12773951158422%
Multi-Core
3898
56.62405578152237%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |