Key Differences
In short — Core i7-1165G7 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-1165G7 is 2186 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-1165G7
- Performs up to 16% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 601 vs 518 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-1165G7 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Tiger Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1449 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU |
No | Overclockable | No |