Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1290 v2 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1290 v2 is 484 days older than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2
- Performs up to 1% better in Valorant than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 705 vs 700 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 87 vs 130 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Xeon E3-1290 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | May 14th, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 87 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
